Available nowENGINE EVALUATION STUDIO

EES

Compare redistributable engine candidates through quantitative benchmarks, blinded human evaluation and license review, preserving reproducible evidence for adoption and replacement decisions.

Product flow

01Quantitative benchmark
02Blinded human evaluation
03License & ADR gate
From input to a verifiable outcome

DESIGNED FOR

Organizations that must replace LLM, SLM, STT and TTS engines based on quality, user evaluation and licensing evidence—not cost or demos alone

OUTCOMES

Start with customer change, not a feature list

Verified live-site capabilities and current product sources are reframed around the customer workflow and operating outcome.

01

Make engine replacement repeatable

Repeat candidate selection, comparison, approval and rollback decisions under one evaluation contract and evidence trail.

02

Combine metrics with human judgment

Use blinded pairwise reviews by employees and partners to capture naturalness and task fit that metrics alone can miss.

03

Promote only deployable candidates

Promote only candidates that pass performance, licensing, redistribution and customer-environment constraints.

CAPABILITY SYSTEM

The capabilities that make the product work

These are product-level capabilities customers can adopt and operate—not isolated buttons or controls.

01

Candidate intake

Register candidates with fixed model revision, provenance, file hashes and execution adapters.

02

Benchmark runs

Record engine-specific datasets, metrics, hardware and run conditions in a manifest.

03

Blind pairwise review

Collect preference and task-fit evidence through blinded pairwise comparison.

04

License review

Review commercial use, redistribution and derivative-work conditions for models, code and data as a separate gate.

05

Promotion gate

Promote candidates to adoption review only after quantitative, qualitative and rights gates pass.

06

Decision record

Preserve rationale, exceptions, approvers and rollback boundaries in a reproducible ADR.

OPERATING FLOW

How it works after adoption

  1. 01

    Fix candidates and criteria

    First fix the target task, baseline engine, candidate revisions and success criteria.

  2. 02

    Run quantitative and human evaluation

    Run same-condition benchmarks and blinded pairwise reviews.

  3. 03

    Review license and deployment

    Review redistribution rights and on-premises operating constraints alongside quality results.

  4. 04

    Promote, replace and record

    Replace only with approved candidates and record decision, observation and rollback conditions in an ADR.

TRUST & DEPLOYMENT

The operating environment and responsibility boundary are part of the product.

01

Private-network & on-premises

Run inside customer environments where models and evaluation data cannot be sent outside.

02

Start with TTS, extend by engine

The initial evaluation path focuses on TTS and extends the same promotion principles to LLM, SLM and STT.

03

QA-owned gate

Manage engine-replacement evidence through QA review and approval boundaries separate from product-team preference.

VERIFIED SCOPE

Evidence and boundaries behind the public copy

  • Three-axis promotion: quantitative benchmark, blinded pairwise review and license due diligence
  • Reproducible evaluation with fixed model revisions, file hashes and run conditions
  • Replacement decisions and rollback boundaries preserved as ADRs